I am the Buddha of Reading Comprehension

Today I got off work at about Noon. I spent the 6 hours after that at work, in the bagel shop, reading and working through practice questions. I was able to make a useful discoveries: 1) I'm in the 95% percentile for reading comprehension questions, and 2) I'm in the 60% percentile for the dreaded logic game questions. As such my studies for the LSAT for the next 3 hours down at Borders were trying to shore up this weak point in my score.

Not that much shoring was done. The Distributive Grouping questions are very hard requiring you to make lots of deductions about the implications of different rules presented to you. What's most frustrating is that of the half I miss, maybe 30% of those are because I miss copied a rule down to my worksheet or just circled the wrong answer.

A few things:

1) Everyone has the most trouble with the logic games.

2) I'm good at the Sequencing and Matching games, it's those freaking (distributive) Grouping games that leave me batting only a point better than average.

3) Kaplan seems to think that the Logic Games are where students show the most improvement, after study.